Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

Koizumi 2014.

Methods Multicentre RCT
 2 arms
Quality score: D
The study was conducted in Japan and Korea.
Participants n = 639, 635 eligible (ITT)
 Median age: 65 years
 Advanced disease: 83%, relapse: 17%
 ECOG 2‐3: 0%
Interventions S‐1+docetaxel: docetaxel (40mg/m2 d1) + S‐1 (40‐60mg/m2 ‐according to BSA‐ twice daily d 1‐14), repeated at d 21
versus
S‐1: S‐1 (40‐60mg/m2 ‐according to BSA‐ twice daily d 1‐28), repeated at d 42
Outcomes Overall survival, progression‐free survival, response rate, safety
Notes The study was conducted in Japan and Korea. The dose of S‐1 which was used in this trial may not be valid for non‐Asian populations for this reason.
This study was registered (NCT00287768).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy Low risk 4 (0.6%) patients were ineligible (no measurable or non‐measurable lesions)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety Low risk All treated patients were included (98%)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Report includes all expected outcomes
Other bias High risk Second‐line treatment was given to 69.7% of patients in the S‐1+docetaxel group and 76% in the S‐1 group, planned interim analysis
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? Unclear risk Images were reviewed by a central review board.