Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

Li 2014.

Methods Single‐centre
Participants n = 16 vs 16
 Average age = 45.7 (range 30‐65) in the FOLFOX4 group, and 42.1 (range 26‐70) in the SOX group.
Interventions "Total of 32 patients with advanced gastric cancer proved pathologically were randomly divided into 2 groups: 16 patients received SOX regimen [oxaliplatin 1.30 mg/m2 as a 2‐hour infusion on day 1, S‐1 capsules 80 mg/m2·d) twice a day per oral from day 1 to day 14 every 3 weeks], the other 16 patients received FOLFOX4 regimen [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2 hour infusion on day 1 and a 2 hour infusion of LV 200/(m2·d) followed by a 5‐Fu bolus 400/(m2·d) and 22 hour infusion 600/(m 2·d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks]. Efficacy was evaluated at least 2 cycles"
Outcomes Response rates
 Disease control rates
 PFS
 OS
 Safety
Notes PFS and OS were not analysed using Kaplan‐Meier methods. HR for PFS could be estimated from summary data but HR for OS could not.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Simple random assignment
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy High risk Time‐to‐event analysed not analysed using Kaplan‐Meier methods.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety High risk Quantitative comparison only made for grade 3 or higher haematological toxicity
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk N/A
Other bias Unclear risk N/A
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? Unclear risk Not stated