Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;2017(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

Popov 2008.

Methods RCT
 2 arms
 Quality score: D
Participants n = 72
 Median age: 56 years
 ECOG 2‐3: 29%
Interventions LV5‐FU2 oxaliplatin: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² d 1+ folinic acid 200 mglm², as 2‐hour infusion, d 1‐2 + 5‐FU 400 mg/m², Lv. bolus d 1‐2, repeated at d 15
versus
LV5‐FU2‐CDDP: cisplatin 50 mg/m², d1+ folinic acid 200 mg/m², as 2‐hour infusion, d 1‐2 + 5‐FU 400 mg/m², Lv. bolus d1‐2 + 5‐FU 600 mg/m² , 22‐hour continuous infusion d 1‐2, repeated at d 15
The maximum number of cycles foreseen was 12
Outcomes Median overall survival
 Median time to progression
 Tumour response rates
 Toxicity
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 efficacy High risk Patients receiving 4 or more cycles were evaluable for efficacy
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 safety Low risk Patients receiving 1 cycle were evaluable for toxicity
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Report includes all expected outcomes
Other bias Unclear risk N/A
Blinded review of CT/MRI‐scans? Low risk "Independent response review was performed by members (surgeon, medical oncologist, radiologist and pathologist) of the joint interdisciplinary committee for gastrointestinal tumors of the Institute and the University Clinic for gastrointestinal diseases. The committee members were not involved in the study"