Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 13;2017(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4

Comparison 2. NIV vs UMC ‐ Admission pH subgroups.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality 12   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Admission pH > 7.30 5 454 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.50 [0.30, 0.84]
1.2 Admission pH < 7.30 8 400 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.35, 0.90]
2 Need for endotracheal intubation 17   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Admission pH > 7.30 7 589 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.30, 0.63]
2.2 Admission pH < 7.30 11 516 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.22, 0.42]