Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 13;2017(7):CD004104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004104.pub4

Comparison 3. NIV vs UMC ‐ Trial location subgroups.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality 10   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Intensive care unit 5 251 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.34, 1.07]
1.2 Ward 5 543 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.29, 0.78]
2 Need for endotracheal intubation 16   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Intensive care unit 9 401 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.30 [0.21, 0.43]
2.2 Ward 8 721 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.43 [0.31, 0.60]