Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 12;2018(2):CD004121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004121.pub4

Comparison 2. Regression of CIN 2 and 3.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Partial or complete regression of CIN 2 or CIN 3 3 132 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.93, 2.27]
2 Complete regression of CIN 2 or CIN 3 2 116 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.31 [0.65, 2.67]
3 Partial regression of CIN 2 or CIN 3 2 116 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [0.72, 3.40]