Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;2017(9):CD004089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004089.pub3

Martin 2002.

Methods Design: randomized controlled trial
Withdrawals: none
Setting: single centre (USA)
Sample size: 90
Participants Age (mean): 6% Hetastarch in normal saline 58, 6% Hetastarch in balanced saline 59, lactated Ringer’s solution 58
Gender (M/F): not described
ASA grade: I to III
Surgery type: major elective non‐cardiac surgery with anticipated blood loss of 500 mL
Surgery duration (mean): not described
Anaesthesia type: general
Interventions Three arms, only 2 of which are included (60 participants)
30 patients were enrolled into the buffered (Hextend) arm; and 30 into the non‐buffered arm (Hespan). Trial fluids were given according to a protocol, to ensure adequate volume during the operation. In addition, each arm was given a maintenance dose of lactated Ringer's solution (a buffered fluid).
Outcomes TEG data measured before induction, at end of surgical procedure, and 24 hours postoperatively
Notes These are the same participant data as in Moretti 2003, but different outcomes are reported.
Funding source: supported in part by a grant from BioTime, Inc.
Declarations of interest: none disclosed
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated sequence
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinded to participants, trial conductors and assessors
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinded to participants, trial conductors and assessors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk One participant in each group fell out ‐ 1 did not need study fluid, the other had surgery rescheduled.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selection bias. All proposed outcome measures adequately reported. Analysis completed on an intention‐to‐treat basis
Other bias Unclear risk Study was funded in part by BioTime Inc., which manufactures Hextend.