Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;2017(9):CD000279. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000279.pub4

Comparison 1. Surveillance versus non surveillance.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Cancer detection 3 7151 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.58 [0.42, 0.80]
2 Death from colorectal cancer 4 530 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.19, 0.69]
3 Cancer Stage‐ Duke A 2 227 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.69 [0.80, 17.12]
4 Cancer Stage‐ Duke B 2 227 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.38 [0.73, 7.73]
5 Cancer stage‐ Duke C 2 227 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.11, 0.98]
6 Cancer stage‐ Duke D 1 186 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.25, 4.31]
7 Cancer stage‐ Duke A or B 2 227 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.40 [1.51, 19.30]
8 Cancer stage‐ Duke C or D 2 227 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.46 [0.08, 2.51]
9 Colectomy 1 186 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.27, 0.88]