Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;2017(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5
Methods Women 'randomly allocated' to 3 groups. Method of randomisation not reported
Participants 60 women attending the clinic in a general hospital, Hubei, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and attended the clinic within 72 h of a single act of unprotected intercourse
Interventions Mife 25 mg vs LNG 0.75 2‐dose 12 h apart orally
Outcomes Observed number of pregnancies, side effects and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes
  1. Post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up not reported

  2. Observed pregnancy/total number of women: Mife 2/30; LNG 8/30

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported planned outcomes
Other bias Low risk None detected