Ye 2013

Methods	Women randomly allocated into 2 groups. Method of randomisation not reported
Participants	120 women attending a family planning service site in Zhejiang, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and a single act of unprotected intercourse within 72 h of attending the service site
Interventions	Mife 25 mg, single dose, orally vs LNG 0.75 mg, 2 doses, 12 h apart
Outcomes	Observed number of pregnancies and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes	Post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up not reported Observed pregnancy/total number women: Mife 0/60; LNG 4/60
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	No mention of post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Low risk	Reported planned outcomes
Other bias	Low risk	None detected