Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;2017(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5
Methods Women randomly allocated into 2 groups. Randomised digital table method was used for randomisation
Participants 130 women attending a ob/gyn department in a general hospital in Shanghai, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and a single act of unprotected intercourse within 72 h of attending the hospital
Interventions Mife 20 mg, single dose, orally vs LNG 0.75 mg, 2 doses, 12 h apart
Outcomes Observed number of pregnancies, side effects and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes
  1. Post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up not reported

  2. Observed pregnancy/total number women: Mife 2/65; LNG 2/65

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised digital table method was used for randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Reported planned outcomes
Other bias Low risk None detected