Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;2017(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5
Methods Women were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Method of randomisation not reported
Participants 100 women attending in an obs/gyn clinic, Guangdong, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and attended the clinic within 72 h of a single act of unprotected intercourse
Interventions LNG 0.75 mg in 2 doses vs Mife 25 mg single dose
Outcomes Observed number of pregnancies and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes
  1. Observed pregnancy/total number of women: LNG 3/50; Mife 0/50

  2. Post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Post‐randomisation exclusion and loss to follow‐up not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Planned outcome of pregnancy rate was reported
Other bias Low risk None detected