Methods |
Women 'randomly allocated' to 2 groups. Method of randomisation not reported |
Participants |
100 women attending a hospital clinic in Shanghai, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and a single act of unprotected intercourse within 120 h of attending the clinic |
Interventions |
Mife single dose 25 mg vs Mife 10 mg |
Outcomes |
Observed number of pregnancies, side effects and changes in menstrual pattern |
Notes |
No loss to follow‐up and exclusions reported
No pregnancies in either group
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Method of allocation concealment not mentioned |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Not mentioned |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
No loss to follow‐up and exclusions reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
Planned outcome was reported |
Other bias |
Low risk |
None detected |