Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;2017(8):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub5
Methods Women 'randomly allocated' to 2 groups. Method of randomisation not reported
Participants 100 women attending a hospital clinic in Shanghai, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and a single act of unprotected intercourse within 120 h of attending the clinic
Interventions Mife single dose 25 mg vs Mife 10 mg
Outcomes Observed number of pregnancies, side effects and changes in menstrual pattern
Notes
  1. No loss to follow‐up and exclusions reported

  2. No pregnancies in either group

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No loss to follow‐up and exclusions reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Planned outcome was reported
Other bias Low risk None detected