Liang 2001

Methods	Women 'randomly allocated' to 2 groups
Participants	400 women attending an MCH hospital clinic in Heilongjiang, China. Women had regular menstrual periods and attended the clinic within 72 h of a single act of unprotected intercourse
Interventions	Mife 25 mg orally vs LNG 0.75 mg orally, 2 doses, 12 h apart
Outcomes	Observed number of pregnancies and side effects
Notes	Post‐randomisation exclusions not reported, loss to follow‐up: Mife 2 women; LNG 3 women Observed pregnancy/expected pregnancy/total number of women: Mife 2/15/198; LNG 4/17/197
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Mentioned randomisation but description not adequate
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Method of allocation concealment not mentioned
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes	Low risk	Loss to follow‐up reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Low risk	Reported planned outcomes
Other bias	Low risk	None detected