No of studies | Design | Risk of Bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other | Certainty (overall score) |
Intervention: Multimodal not WHO‐based Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
5 | 4 RCT 1 ITS (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Multimodal not WHO‐based Outcome: Infection rates | |||||||
3 | 2 RCT 1 ITS (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐based Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
5 | 1 RCT 4 ITS (2) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Very low (1) |
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐based Outcome: Infection rates | |||||||
2 | 2 ITS (2) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Very low (1) |
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐based Outcome: Colonisation rates | |||||||
2 | 1 RCT 1 ITS (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐enhanced Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
6 | 2 RCT 4 ITS (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐enhanced Outcome: Infection rates | |||||||
1 | 1 ITS (2) |
Serious risk of bias (‐.5) |
No inconsistency in effect sizes | No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Very low (1.5) |
Intervention: Performance feedback Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
6 | 3 RCT, 1 NRCT, 2 ITS (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Performance feedback Outcome: Infection rates | |||||||
1 | 1 RCT (4) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Moderate (3) |
Intervention: Performance feedback Outcome: Colonization rates | |||||||
1 | 1 RCT (4) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Moderate (3) |
Intervention: Education Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
2 | 1 RCT 1 ITS (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Cues Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
3 | 2 RCT, 1 NRCT (3) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
Important inconsistency in effect sizes (‐0.5) |
No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Low (2) |
Intervention: Placement of ABHR Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance | |||||||
1 | 1 RCT (4) |
Serious risk of bias (‐0.5) |
No inconsistency in effect sizes | No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | None | Moderate (3.5) |