Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 1;2017(9):CD005186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005186.pub4
No of studies Design Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other Certainty (overall score)
Intervention: Multimodal not WHO‐based
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
5 4 RCT
1 ITS
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Multimodal not WHO‐based
Outcome: Infection rates
3 2 RCT
1 ITS
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐based
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
5 1 RCT
4 ITS
(2)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Very low
(1)
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐based
Outcome: Infection rates
2 2 ITS
(2)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Very low
(1)
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐based
Outcome: Colonisation rates
2 1 RCT
1 ITS
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐enhanced
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
6 2 RCT
4 ITS
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Multimodal WHO‐enhanced
Outcome: Infection rates
1 1 ITS
(2)
Serious risk of bias
(‐.5)
No inconsistency in effect sizes No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Very low
(1.5)
Intervention: Performance feedback
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
6 3 RCT, 1 NRCT,
2 ITS
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Performance feedback
Outcome: Infection rates
1 1 RCT
(4)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Moderate
(3)
Intervention: Performance feedback
Outcome: Colonization rates
1 1 RCT
(4)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Moderate
(3)
Intervention: Education
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
2 1 RCT
1 ITS
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Cues
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
3 2 RCT,
1 NRCT
(3)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
Important inconsistency in effect sizes
(‐0.5)
No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Low
(2)
Intervention: Placement of ABHR
Outcome: Hand Hygiene Compliance
1 1 RCT
(4)
Serious risk of bias
(‐0.5)
No inconsistency in effect sizes No serious indirectness No serious imprecision None Moderate
(3.5)