Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 1;2017(9):CD005186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005186.pub4

Huang 2002.

Methods Design: RCT
 Study period: September 2000‐January 2001
Questionnaires and observations done at baseline and at 4 months post‐intervention
 China
Participants Nurses throughout a hospital
Interventions Education, mainly universal precautions
Outcomes % of nurses washing hands before and after patient contact
Also evaluated knowledge scores, prevalence of Hepatitis B immunisation, self‐reported behaviours related to blood‐borne pathogens and universal precautions, self‐reported needlestick and sharps injury, and observed behaviours related to handling used needles.
Notes Intervention successful after 4 months
Appropriate analysis
Funding source: No information given
Declaration of Interest: No information given
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not specified how were randomly selected to participate nor randomly allocated to group
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation was done at the start of the study but method was not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Education and questionnaire were very specific so participants aware of intervention
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Researchers did not specify if observers were blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 98% follow‐up achieved in both groups
Missing data (missed opportunities) unlikely to be different in both arms
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No evidence
Baseline outcomes Low risk Similar at baseline
Baseline characteristics Low risk Similar at baseline
Protection from contamination Unclear risk Participants worked in same institution so may have communicated with each other