Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 8;2017(9):CD011572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011572.pub2

3. Baseline characteristics of induction and maintenance trials.

  Trial Phase Setting (number of centres) Comparator Placebo patients Mean age Follow‐up
(weeks)
Mean entry
UCDAI score
Response definition Remission definition
1 Aoyama 2015 induction (1) Multicenter, single country (NS) Budesonide foam NS NS 6 NS NS RBS = 0, endoscopic sub score < 1 and stool frequency sub score = 0 or decrease > 1
2 Beeken 1997 induction (2) Multicenter, multinational (4) Aminosalicylate 13 48 6 7.8 Mean/median score improvement NS
3 Carbonnel 2016 induction (3) Multicenter, multinational (26) Methotrexate 51 NS 24 NS NS Mayo Clinic subscore < 2 with no item >1
4 Danese 2014 induction (4) Multicenter, multinational (30) Tralokinumab 55 41 24 8.3 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
5 Deventer 2006 induction (5) Multicenter, multinational (30) Alicaforsen 22 50 6 6.5 Decrease in RBS of 0‐1or more from baseline NS
6 Deventer 2004 induction (6) Multicenter (NS) Alicaforsen 8   4 7.5 Percent reduction in DAI NS
7 Feagan 2000 induction (7) Multicenter, single country (NS) Vedolizumab 8 NS 4 8 Improvement in Baron ≥ 2 points Mayo 0; Modified Baron 0
8 Feagan 2005 induction (8) Multicenter, single country (20) Vedolizumab 63 38.9 6 6.7 Improvement in UCCS ≥ 3 points UCCS ≤ 1 and a modified Baron ≤ 1
9 Feagan 2013a induction (9) Multicenter, multinational (26) Mesalamine 141 40.4 10 NS UCDAI decrease by ≥3 points UCDAI, SFS and RBS scores of 0, and no fecal urgency
10 Feagan 2013b induction (10) Multicenter, multinational (211) Vedolizumab 149 41.2 6 8.6 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤ 2 points; no individual sub score > 1 point
    maintenance (1) Multicenter, multinational (211) Vedolizumab 126 40.3 52 8.4 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤ 2 points; no individual sub score > 1 point
11 Hanauer 2000 maintenance (2) Multicenter
(9)
Mesalamine 34 37.3 96 NS NS UCDAI score = 0 was the definition of clinical and endoscopic remission
Relapse defined as symptoms of rectal bleeding or increase in stool frequency for > 1 wk and endoscopic evidence of inflammation
12 Jiang 2015 induction (11) Single centre Infliximab 41 34.5 8 NS Decrease in total MCS > 3 points or > 30% from baseline, with a decrease in RBS > 1 point or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1 Total Mayo score = 2 points with no individual sub score > 1 point
    maintenance (3) Single centre Infliximab 41 34.5 30 NS Decrease in total MCS > 3 points or > 30% from baseline, with a decrease in RBS > 1 point or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1 Total Mayo score of < 2 points with no individual sub score > 1 point
13 Kamm 2007 induction (12) Multicenter. multinational (49) MMX mesalamine 86 43.2 8 NS UCDAI decrease by ≥3 points UCDAI ≤1+ RBS=0 + SFS=0 ; and ≥1 point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score
14 Leiper 2011 induction (13) Single country (1) Rituximab 8 50 24 7.6 Decrease in Mayo ≥ 3 points Decrease in Mayo to ≤ 2
15 Lewis 2008 induction (14) Multicenter, single country (15) Rosiglitazone 53   12 NS Decrease in Mayo ≥2 points Mayo score ≤ 2
16 Lichtenstein 2007 induction (15) Multicenter, multinational (52) MMX mesalamine 93 42.6 8 NS UCDAI decrease by ≥3 points UCDAI ≤1+ RBS=0 + SFS=0 ; and ≥1 point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score
17 Lichtenstein 2010 maintenance (4) Multicenter, multinational (48) Mesalamine 96 46 24 NS NS Relapse free at 6 months
18 Marteau 2005 induction (16) Multicenter, multinational (43) Mesalazine enema 56 NS 8 NS UCDAI decrease by ≥2 points UCDAI ≤1
19 Mayer 2014 induction (17) Multicenter, multinational (54) BMS‐936557 54 41.8 8 7.9 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
20 Nikolaus 2003 induction (18) Multicenter, multinational (6) rIFN‐β‐1a 7   6 NS Reduction of ≥3 points in the UCSS symptoms score and PGA All clinical UCSS sub scores equal to 0, with a proctosigmoidoscopy score of 0 or 1
21 Ogata 2006 induction (19) Multicenter, single country (17) Tacrolimus 21 30 2 9.4 Reduction in DAI of more than 4 points with improvement of all categories Complete resolution of all symptoms (all assessment scores were zero)
22 Ogata 2012 induction (20) Multicenter, single country (NS) Tacrolimus 30 NS 2 9.1 Reduction in DAI of more than 4 points with improvement of all categories Total DAI score 2 with all individual sub scores
of 0 or 1
23 Oren 1996 induction (21) Multicenter, single country (12) Methotrexate 37 38.9 36 6.8 NS MCS (including the endoscopic sub score) of < 3 with no steroid use, and without a score of < 2 without sigmoidoscopy results
    maintenance (5) Multicenter, single country (12) Methotrexate 37 38.9 36 6.8 NS Relapse was an increase in the MCS of > 3 (not including sigmoidoscopy) and/or reintroduction of steroids at a dose of > 300 mg/month
25 Probert 2003 induction (22) Multicenter, multinational (4) Infliximab 20 NS 6 8.5 Decrease in Baron of ≥ 1 UCCS ≤ 2 AND/OR Baron score = 0
25 Reinisch 2011 induction (23) Multicenter, multinational (94) Adalimumab 130 NS 8 8.7 Decrease in Mayo > 3 points and decrease in the RBS >1/absolute RBS of 0 or 1 Mayo score < 2 with no individual sub score > 1
26 Reinisch 2015 induction (24) Multicenter, multinational (38) Anrukinzumab 21 36.6 32 6.6 Decrease from baseline of ≥3 points in total Mayo score, with at least a 30% change, accompanied by ≥1 point decrease or absolute score of 0 or 1 in RBS Defined as proportion of subjects with a total Mayo score ≤ 2, with no individual sub score > 1
27 Rubin 2015 induction (25) NS Budesonide MMX® NS NS     NS rectal bleeding and stool frequency sub scores = 0
28 Rutgeerts 2005a induction (26) Multicenter, multinational (62) Infliximab 121 41.4 8 8.4 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
    maintenance (6)                
29 Rutgeerts 2005b induction (27) Multicenter, multinational (55) Infliximab 123 39.3 8 8.5 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
    maintenance (7)                
30 Rutgeerts 2013a induction (28) Multicenter, multinational (15) Etrolizumab 5 30.2 4 9 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
31 Rutgeerts 2013b induction (29) Multicenter, multinational (15) Etrolizumab 5 39 5 10 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
32 Rutgeerts 2015 induction (30)                
33 Sandborn 1994 induction (31) Single centre Cyclosporin 20   4 NS Reduction
of ≥3 points in DAI
UCDAI=0
34 Sandborn 2003 induction (32) Multicenter, single country (15) Repifermin 28 NS 6   Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points compared with baseline at week 4 A score of zero on the sigmoidoscopy all sub scores = 0 (SFS, PGA, RBS)
35 Sandborn 2012a induction (33) Multicenter, multinational (103) Adalimumab 260 41.3 8 8.9 Decrease in Mayo ≥ 3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual sub score >1 point
    maintenance (8)                
36 Sandborn 2012b induction (34) Multicenter, multinational (108) Budesonide MMX 128   8 NS ≥3‐point decrease in
UCDAI, and ≥1‐point reduction in the endoscopy sub score
UCDAI ≤1+ RBS=0 + SFS=0; no mucosal on colonoscopy ; and ≥1 point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score
37 Sandborn 2012c induction (35) Multicenter, multinational (51) Tofacitinib 48 42.5 8 8.2 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 MCS = 2 with no individual sub score> 1
38 Sandborn 2012d induction (36) Multicenter, multinational (142) Abatacept 140 40.9 12 8.8 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 MCS = 2 with no individual sub score> 1
    maintenance (9) Multicenter, multinational (142) Abatacept 66 NS 52 NS NS NS
39 Sandborn 2013a (BUCF3001) induction (37) Multicenter, multinational (NS) Budesonide Foam NS NS   7.9 NS Endoscopy score ≤ 1, RBS = 0 and improvement or no change from baseline in stool frequency subscales of MMDAI**
40 Sandborn 2013b (BUCF3002) induction (38) Multicenter, multinational (NS) Budesonide Foam NS NS NS 8 NS Endoscopy score ≤ 1, RBS = 0 and improvement or no change from baseline in stool frequency subscales of MMDAI
41 Sandborn 2014a maintenance (10) Multicenter, multinational (217) Golimumab 331 39 8 8.3 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual subscore >1 point
42 Sandborn 2014b induction (39) Multicenter, multinational (251) Golimumab 156 40.2 54 8.3 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual subscore >1 point
43 Sandborn 2015 induction (40) Multicenter,
multinational
(75)
Eldelumab 83 42.7 11 8.6 Mayo score < 2 points
 with no individual subscore > 1 point Reduction
 from baseline ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% in Mayo score, reduction
 ≥ 1 in RBS, or absolute RBS
 ≤ 1
44 Sands 2012 induction (41) Multicenter, multinational
(46)
Basiliximab 51 38 8 NS Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual subscore >1 point
45 Scherl 2009 induction (42) Multicenter, single country (55) Balsalazide 83 45.4 8 8 ≥3 point improvement in modified Mayo, ≥1 point improvement in RBS 0 for RBS and combined score of ≤2 for SFS and PGA using the Modified Mayo subscales
46 Schreiber 2007 induction (43) Multicenter, single country (35) Tetomilast 62 45.5 8 7.5 Reduction
of ≥3 points in DAI
UCDAI ≤1
47 Schroeder 1987 induction (44) Single center Mesalamine 38 42.7 6 NS 'substantial' improvement in scores Complete resolution of symptoms (total score 0)
48 Sninsky 1991 induction (45) Multicenter, single country (9) Mesalamine 52 39.2 6 NS Reduction in the PGA score and in at least one other component score Complete resolution of all symptoms with all assessment scores 0
49 Steinhart 1996 induction (46) Multicenter, single country (2) Butyrate 19 38.6 6 7.8 Reduction
of ≥2 points in UCDAI
UCDAI ≤1
50 Sutherland 1987a induction (47) Multicenter, multinational (8) Aminosalicylate 77 36 6 NS PGA, % drop in DAI from baseline (total and subscores) NS§
51 Sutherland 1987b induction (48) Multicenter, single country (2) Aminosalicylate 30 36 6 NS PGA, mean DAI NS
52 Sutherland 1990 induction (49) Multicenter, multinational (7) Aminosalicylate 44 37.8 6 8.2 PGA, mean DAI NS
53 Suzuki 2014 maintenance (11) Multicenter,
single country (65)
Adalimumab 96 41.3 52 8.5 Decrease of > 3 points and > 30 % from
 baseline plus a decrease in the RBS > 1 or an absolute score of < 1 Full Mayo
 score < 2 with no individual subscore > 1
54 Suzuki 2015 induction (51) Multicenter, single country (NS) Infliximab 104 NS 8 NS NS NS
    maintenance (12) Multicenter, single country (NS) Infliximab 104 NS 30 NS NS NS
55 Travis 2014 induction (52) Multicenter, multinational (69) Budesonide MMX 128 39.9 8 6.2 ≥3‐point decrease in
UCDAI, and ≥1‐point reduction in the endoscopy subscore
UCDAI ≤1+ RBS=0 + SFS=0; no mucosal on colonoscopy; and ≥1 point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score
56 Van Assche 2006 induction (53) Multicenter, multinational (40) Daclizumab 56 40.7 20 8 Decrease in Mayo ≥ 3 points Mayo 0 for endoscopy and RBS; Mayo 0/1 for SFS† and PGA‡
57 Vermeire 2011 induction (54) Multicenter, multinational (17) PF‐00547,659 20 47.9 4 7.5 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual subscore >1 point
58 Vermeire 2014 induction (55) Multicenter. Multinational
(40)
Etrolizumab 43 37.5 10 9.1 Decrease in Mayo ≥3 points and ≥30%; plus decrease in RBS of ≥1 point or absolute RBS 0 /1 Mayo score ≤2 points; no individual subscore >1 point
59 Watanabe 2013 induction (56) Multicenter, single country (45) Aminosalicylate 64 41.3 4 5.5 NS Rectal mucosal score of 0 or 1
60 Williams 1987 induction (57) Multicenter, single country (2) NS 13 42.7 6 7.4 NS DAI score of 0
61 Yoshimura 2015 induction (58) Multicenter, single country (42) AJM300 51 42.6 8 7.7 Decrease in MCS of at least 3 points and
 a decrease of at least 30% from the baseline score, with a
 decrease of at least 1 point on the RBS or
 an absolute RBS of 0 or 1 MCS of 2 or lower and no subscore higher than 1

NS: not stated

RBS: rectal bleeding score

DAI: Disease Activity Index

UCCS: Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Score

UCDAI: Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index

SFS: stool frequency score

PGA: physician's global assessment