Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 8;2017(9):CD011572. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011572.pub2

Sutherland 1987b.

Methods 6‐week, randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled design (N = 59)
Participants Patients were > 18 years who had UC involving 5‐50 cm of colon continuously from the anus, confirmed by sigmoidoscopy with biopsies taken from an area of active disease
Patients had to have a minimum score of 3 on a 12‐point DAI
Interventions Group 1: 4 g 5‐ASA enema (60 mL) (n = 29)
Group 2: placebo enema (n = 30)
Patients were instructed to use one enema daily at bedtime
Outcomes Primary outcome: physician's global assessment of the patient at the end of the study period, mean DAI
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random numbers table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind medication was prepackaged to ensure that an equal and random assignment within each centre occurred
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Drop‐outs balanced across groups with similar reasons for withdrawal
There were 12 dropouts (five in the active and seven in the placebo group) during the study because of insufficient efficacy
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All expected outcomes were reported
Other bias Unclear risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias