Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD003843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003843.pub3
Methods RCT
Participants Country: Japan N = 46 ASA: I/II Gender: Female/male 15/5, 15/4 Age: 33±9, 37±14 years. Exclusion ‐ not mentioned Operation: laparotomy (6;4), laparoscopy (7;3), surgery on extremities (5;5), arthroscopy (1;2), surface (1;1), head and neck (0;3) Duration of anaesthesia: 190±45, 191±57
Interventions
  1. Propofol infusion guided by BIS (A‐1050), target BIS value at 40‐60, Cn =20

  2. Propofol guided by standard clinical signs, Cn =19

Outcomes ‐Propofol infusion rate ‐Total amount of propofol used ‐Recovery profiles ‐Patients with undesirable responses
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All expected outcomes reported
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information
Blinding of patients? Low risk Patients were anaesthetized
Blinding of anaesthesiologists? High risk It was unlikely to blind the anaesthesia provider from the assigned groups
Blinding of outcome assessors? Unclear risk Insufficient information