Stahl 2005.
Methods | Randomized controlled study | |
Participants | Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the upper and mid‐third esophagus (no exact definition given on tumor location from dental ridge); age < 70 years, WHO performance status 0 to 1. Locally advanced disease (T3‐4, N0‐1, M0 according to endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography); June 1994 to May 2002; Germany (multi‐center) 172 participants (138 male, 34 female) Median observation time: 6 years Participants randomized/analysed in this meta‐analysis: 172/172 |
|
Interventions | Induction chemotherapy, followed by preoperative chemoradiation versus induction chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation alone. Both groups received induction chemotherapy, consisting of three courses of bolus fluorouracil (500 mg/m²), leucovarin (300 mg/m²), etoposide (100 mg/m²), cisplatin(30 mg/m²) days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks. Intervention group: After induction chemotherapy, preoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy was given as detailed below. Chemotherapy: Cisplatin (50 mg/m²) , etoposide(80 mg/m²) on days 2 to 8 Radiotherapy: 2 Gy per fraction, 5 fractions per week to a total dose of 40 Gy. Radiotherapy clinical target volume included gross tumor with 5 cm craniocaudal margin and 2 cm transverse margin. Supra‐, infraclavicular, and lower cervical lymph nodes were included for upper thoracic tumors. AP and PA fields were used in conjunction with three‐dimensional planning. Surgery: transthoracic esophagacteomy was performed 3 to 4 weeks after chemoradiation. Resection included para‐esophageal, paracardial, left gastric, and celiac nodes (two‐field lymphadenectomy) Control group: after induction chemotherapy, definitive chemoradiotherapy was given. Chemotherapy: Cisplatin (50 mg/m²), etoposide(80 mg/m²) on days 2 to 8. Radiotherapy: 2 Gy per fraction, 5 fractions per week to a total dose of 50 Gy initially. Following which, a boost was delivered. Radiotherapy boost to reduced volume: For T4 and obstructing T3 tumors, a total external beam dose of 65 Gy was delivered. (i.e. 15 Gy delivered using 1.5 Gy twice a day, 6‐hour intervals, over 5 days) For T3 and non‐obstructing tumors, external beam dose to a total of 60 Gy, followed by intracavitary brachytherapy (two fractions of 4 Gy high dose rate administered with a 4 to 7 day interval; prescribed to 5 mm depth from applicator to pre‐radiotherapy tumor length and 5 mm superior and inferior margin) Radiotherapy clinical target volume for the initial phase included gross tumor with 5 cm craniocaudal margin and 2 cm transverse margin. Supra‐, infraclavicular, and lower cervical lymph nodes were included for upper thoracic tumors. Radiotherapy clinical target volume (external beam) for the boost phase included gross tumor with 2 cm craniocaudal margin and 1 cm transverse margin. AP, PA, and oblique fields were used in conjunction with three‐dimensional planning. |
|
Outcomes | overall survival, local progression free survival, treatment‐related mortality | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Sequence was generated using a computerized randomization program. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation was done at a central site (Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Clinics Essen) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | The risk of bias for the primary outcome (overall survival) is objective and therefore low. However, the risk of bias from lack of blinding was high for local progression‐free survival. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | The risk of bias for the primary outcome (overall survival) is objective and therefore low. However, the risk of bias from lack of blinding was high for local progression‐free survival. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing outcome data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The prespecified primary outcome was reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Quality assurance of radiotherapy planning and delivery were not reported. Type and quality of surgeries performed were not audited or reported. |
Key: AP = anterior‐posterior ; PA = posterior‐anterior