Girault 2003.
Methods | Randomized cross‐over study comparing HME to HH. | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria: people with acute or chronic respiratory failure difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation. Mean age: 69 years. Exclusion criteria: non‐co‐operative people, unable to have an oesophageal tube. Respiratory diagnosis: 100%. Mean SAPS score: 44. Setting: ICU, France. |
|
Interventions | HME (hygroscopic): Hygrobac (DAR). n = 11. HH (heated wire): MR730 (Fischer & Paykel). n = 11. Time in study: 2 × 20 min for HME (7 cm H2O/min and 18 cm H2O/min ventilation pressure), 2 × 20 min for HH (7 cm H2O/min and 18 cm H2O/min ventilation pressure). |
|
Outcomes |
* Data not used as this was unlikely to be a valid outcome in a cross‐over study. |
|
Notes | Funding: not stated. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 3/15 participants withdrawn from study early because they could not "tolerate" HME and 1 participant refused to continue study. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No protocol available but a range of respiratory variables reported for this short‐term study. |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified. |