Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 14;2017(9):CD004711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004711.pub3

Lorente 2006.

Methods Randomized parallel study comparing HME to HH.
Participants Inclusion criteria: adults expected to require ventilation for ≥ 5 days.
Mean age: HME 56 years, HH 55 years.
Exclusion criteria: aged < 18 years, HIV, blood leukocytes < 1000/mm3, solid or haematological tumour, immunosuppressive therapy.
Respiratory diagnosis: HME 24%, HH 31%.
Mean APACHE II score: HME 18.11, HH 18.72.
Setting: ICU, Spain.
Interventions HME: Edith Flex (Datex‐Ohmeda) changed at 48‐hr intervals.
n = 53.
HH (heated wire): MR 850 (Fisher & Paykel) and Aerodyne 2000 (Tyco Healthcare/Nellcor) set at 37 ºC.
n = 51.
Time in study (mean): HME 20 days, HH 21 days.
Outcomes
  • VAP.

Notes Funding: not stated.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Patients were assigned ‐‐‐ by a random number list generated using Excel software."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Data from participants available at follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No protocol available and only 1 primary outcome reported.
Other bias Low risk None identified.