Lorente 2006.
Methods | Randomized parallel study comparing HME to HH. | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria: adults expected to require ventilation for ≥ 5 days. Mean age: HME 56 years, HH 55 years. Exclusion criteria: aged < 18 years, HIV, blood leukocytes < 1000/mm3, solid or haematological tumour, immunosuppressive therapy. Respiratory diagnosis: HME 24%, HH 31%. Mean APACHE II score: HME 18.11, HH 18.72. Setting: ICU, Spain. |
|
Interventions | HME: Edith Flex (Datex‐Ohmeda) changed at 48‐hr intervals. n = 53. HH (heated wire): MR 850 (Fisher & Paykel) and Aerodyne 2000 (Tyco Healthcare/Nellcor) set at 37 ºC. n = 51. Time in study (mean): HME 20 days, HH 21 days. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Funding: not stated. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "Patients were assigned ‐‐‐ by a random number list generated using Excel software." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Data from participants available at follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No protocol available and only 1 primary outcome reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified. |