Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 14;2017(9):CD004711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004711.pub3

Pelosi 1996.

Methods Randomized cross‐over study comparing 2 types of HME to HH.
Participants Inclusion criteria: people with moderate acute respiratory failure, receiving pressure‐support ventilation.
Mean age: 54 years.
Exclusion criteria: COPD.
Respiratory diagnosis: 100%.
Mean SAPS score: 12.
Setting: ICU, Italy.
Interventions HME (hygroscopic): Hygroster.
n = 7.
HME: Hygrobac‐S (DAR).
n = 7.
HH: MR450 (Fisher & Paykel).
n = 14.
Time in study: 90 min.
Outcomes
  • Minute ventilation.

  • Tidal volume.

  • Respiratory rate.

Notes Funding: not stated.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 100% follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No protocol available but 3 respiratory variables reported for this short‐term study.
Other bias Low risk None identified.