Pelosi 1996.
Methods | Randomized cross‐over study comparing 2 types of HME to HH. | |
Participants | Inclusion criteria: people with moderate acute respiratory failure, receiving pressure‐support ventilation. Mean age: 54 years. Exclusion criteria: COPD. Respiratory diagnosis: 100%. Mean SAPS score: 12. Setting: ICU, Italy. |
|
Interventions | HME (hygroscopic): Hygroster. n = 7. HME: Hygrobac‐S (DAR). n = 7. HH: MR450 (Fisher & Paykel). n = 14. Time in study: 90 min. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Funding: not stated. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 100% follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No protocol available but 3 respiratory variables reported for this short‐term study. |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified. |