Ricard 1999.
Methods | Randomized parallel/cross‐over* study comparing 4 types of HME to HH. * Participants randomized to 2/5 interventions. |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: people requiring mechanical ventilation. Mean age: 54 years. Exclusion criteria: not stated. Respiratory diagnosis: 58%. Mean SAPS score: 14. Setting: ICU, France. |
|
Interventions | HME (hydrophobic): Ultipor Filter BB2215 (Pall). n = 20. HME (hydrophobic): Biomedical BB50 (Pall). n = 20. HME (hydrophobic/hygroscopic): Ultipor Filter BB100 (Pall). n = 20. HME (hydrophobic/hygroscopic): Hygrobac (DAR). n = 10. HH: Fischer‐Paykel. n = 15. Time in study: 3 hr. |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Funding: authors declared they did not have any funding support and had no conflict of interest. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 100% follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol available but 2 respiratory variables reported for this short‐term study. |
Other bias | Low risk | None identified. |