Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;2017(9):CD011864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011864.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Postoperative MMC‐EMDA induction versus MMC‐PD induction therapy for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Participants: people with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (carcinoma in situ or concurrent pT1, or both)
Setting: multicentre study in Italy (all comparisons in the review stemmed from same study group)
Intervention: initial 6 MMC‐EMDA intravesical instillations at weekly interval about 3 weeks after TURBT
Control: initial 6 MMC‐PD intravesical instillations at weekly interval about 3 weeks after TURBT
Outcomes No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Relative effect
 (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)
Risk with MMC‐PD Risk difference with postoperative MMC‐EMDA
Time to recurrence
Follow‐up: mean 3 months
72
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Low1,2 RR 0.65
 (0.44 to 0.98) Study population
722 per 1000 253 fewer per 1000
 (404 fewer to 14 fewer)
Moderate
420 per 1000 3 147 fewer per 1000
 (235 fewer to 8 fewer)
Time to progression
Follow‐up: mean 3 months
72
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Low1,4 Not estimable Study population
Serious adverse events
Follow‐up: mean 3 months
72
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low1,5 RR 1.50
 (0.27 to 8.45) Study population
56 per 1000 28 more per 1000
 (41 fewer to 414 more)
High
30 per 10003 15 more per 1000
 (22 fewer to 223 more)
Disease‐specific survival
Follow‐up: mean 3 months
72
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Low1,4 Not estimable Study population
Disease‐specific quality of life ‐ not reported
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; MMC‐EMDA: electromotive drug administration of mitomycin C; MMC‐PD: passive diffusion of mitomycin C; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio; TURBT: transurethral resection of bladder tumour.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 Downgraded by one level for study limitations: unclear risk of selection bias, high risk of performance, detection and other bias.

2 Downgraded by one level for imprecision: confidence interval crossed assumed clinically meaningful threshold.

3Witjes 1998: recurrence rate of bladder cancer after TURBT with postoperative MMC‐PD instillations (total 5 instillations) was 42.8% and incidence of systemic adverse events was 3% based on a long‐term median follow‐up of more than 7 years.

4 Downgraded by one level for imprecision: no event.

5 Downgraded by two level for imprecision: confidence interval was wide and crossed assumed clinically meaningful threshold.