Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;2017(9):CD011864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011864.pub2

Summary of findings 4. Single‐dose, preoperative MMC‐EMDA versus single‐dose, postoperative MMC‐PD for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Participants: people with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (primary pTa and pT1 urothelial carcinoma)
Setting: multicentre study in Italy (all comparisons in the review stemmed from same study group)
Intervention: single MMC‐EMDA intravesical instillation about 30 minutes before spinal or general anaesthesia for TURBT
Control: single MMC‐PD intravesical instillation immediately after TURBT
Outcomes No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Relative effect
 (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)
Risk with MMC‐PD Risk difference with preoperative MMC‐EMDA
Time to recurrence
Follow‐up: median 86 months
236
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1 HR 0.47
 (0.32 to 0.69) Study population
588 per 1000 247 fewer per 1000
 (341 fewer to 130 fewer)
Low 2
100 per 1000 52 fewer per 1000
 (67 fewer to 30 fewer)
High 2
500 per 1000 222 fewer per 1000
 (301 fewer to 120 fewer)
Time to progression
Follow‐up: median 86 months
236
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low1,3 HR 0.81
 (0.00 to 259.93) Study population
193 per 1000 34 fewer per 1000
 (193 fewer to 807 more)
Low 2
20 per 1000 4 fewer per 1000
 (20 fewer to 975 more)
High 2
100 per 1000 18 fewer per 1000
 (100 fewer to 900 more)
Serious adverse events
Follow‐up: median 86 months
236
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 Very low1,3 RR 0.79
 (0.30 to 2.05) Study population
76 per 1000 16 fewer per 1000
 (53 fewer to 79 more)
High 4
30 per 1000 6 fewer per 1000
 (21 fewer to 31 more)
Disease‐specific survival
Follow‐up: median 86 months
236
 (1 RCT) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Low3 HR 0.99
 (0.74 to 1.32) Study population
126 per 1000 1 fewer per 1000
 (31 fewer to 37 more)
Low 2
20 per 1000 0 fewer per 1000
 (5 fewer to 6 more)
High 2
60 per 1000 1 fewer per 1000
 (15 fewer to 18 more)
Disease‐specific quality of life ‐ not reported
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; MMC‐EMDA: electromotive drug administration of mitomycin C; MMC‐PD: passive diffusion of mitomycin C; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RR: risk ratio; TURBT: transurethral resection of bladder tumour.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

1 Downgraded by one level for study limitations: high risk of performance bias.

2Sylvester 2016: baseline risks of time to recurrence and progression, and disease‐specific survival were estimated from included studies in a systematic review and meta‐analysis of RCTs comparing the efficacy of a single instillation of MMC after TURBT with TURBTs alone.

3 Downgraded by two level for imprecision: confidence interval was wide and crossed clinically meaningful threshold.

4Witjes 1998: incidence of systemic adverse events after TURBT with postoperative MMC‐PD instillations (total 5 instillations) was 3% based on a long‐term median follow‐up of more than 7 years.