Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;2017(9):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison.

Mepolizumab subcutaneous (SC) compared to placebo for asthma

Mepolizumab (SC) compared to placebo for asthma
Patient or population: people with asthma Setting: community Intervention: mepolizumab (SC) Comparison: placebo
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) № of participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Risk with placebo Risk with mepolizumab (SC)
Rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids Follow‐up: range 24 to 32 weeks The mean rate in the placebo group was 1.48 events per participant per yeara The mean rate in the intervention group was 0.81 fewer events per participant per year (95% CI 0.66 fewer to 0.94 fewer) Rate ratio 0.45 (0.36 to 0.55) 936 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
Rate of exacerbations requiring emergency department treatment or admission Follow‐up: range 24 to 32 weeks The mean rate in the placebo group was 0.15 events per patient per yearb The mean rate in the intervention group was 0.10 fewer events per participant per year (95% CI 0.05 fewer to 0.12 fewer) Rate ratio 0.36 (0.20 to 0.66) 936 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
Health‐related quality of life (ACQ) Scale from: 0 to 6 (lower is better) Follow‐up: range 24 to 32 weeks The mean change in the placebo group ranged from −0.4 to −0.5 units The mean in the intervention group was ‐0.42 units fewer (‐0.56 fewer to ‐0.28 fewer) 936 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderatec A change of ≥ 0.5 is considered the minimum clinically significant difference
Health‐related quality of life (SGRQ) Scale from: 0 to 100 (lower is better) Follow‐up: range 24 to 32 weeks The mean change in the placebo group ranged from −7.9 to −9.0 units The mean change in the intervention group was ‐7.4 units fewer (‐9.5 fewer to ‐5.29 fewer) 936 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High A change of ≥ 4 is considered the minimum clinically significant difference
Pre‐bronchodilator FEV1 (L) Follow‐up: range 24 to 32 weeks The mean change in the placebo group ranged from 0.086 L (± 0.031 L) to 0.120 L (0.047 to 0.192 L) The mean difference from placebo was a further 0.11 L (0.06 L to 0.17 L) 936 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
Adverse events leading to discontinuation Follow‐up: range 24 to 32 weeks 15 per 1000 7 per 1000 (2 to 27) Risk ratio 0.45 (0.11 to 1.80) 936 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊝ Moderated
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire; CI: confidence interval; FEV1 : forced expiratory volume in 1 second; RR: risk ratio; SC: subcutaneous; SGRQ: St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High quality: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate quality: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low quality: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low quality: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

aRounded mean of the rate in the placebo group of the two studies: 1.21 and 1.74. bRounded mean of the rate in the placebo group of the two studies: 0.10 and 0.20. cThe mean difference (‐0.42) is smaller than the minimum clinically significant difference (a reduction of 0.5 points). dThe 95% CI crosses the line of no effect, thus we downgraded the quality of evidence to moderate because of imprecision.