Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;2017(9):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub3
Study Reason for exclusion
Albers 2016 Post‐hoc analysis of observational study
Alvarez‐Cuesta 1994 Intervention used in study (cat extract immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Armentia 1992 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Austin 2016 Aggregation of two clinical trials
Ayres 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Bel 2014 Focus of trial is on steroid reduction and therefore does not meet our predefined inclusion criteria
Berger 2003 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Blanken 2012 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Blanken 2013 Intervention used in study (pavilizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Boulet 1997 Intervention used in study (anti‐IgE antibody e25) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Bousquet 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Bousquet 2011 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Brightling 2014 Intervention used in study (tralokinumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Brown 2007 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Brusselle 2016 Aggregation of two clinical trials
Bryant 1975a Not a RCT
Bryant 1975b Not a RCT
Buhl 2000a Intervention used in study (rhumab‐25) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Buhl 2000b Intervention used in study (rhumab‐25) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Buhl 2002 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Bush 1985 Intervention used in study (soybean oil) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Busse 2001 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Busse 2008 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Busse 2015 Intervention used in study (tralokinumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Buttner 2003 Treatment < 16 weeks
Caffarelli 2000 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Canvin 2016 Aggregation of two clinical trials
Castro 2011 < 16 weeks in length
Castro 2014b Intervention used in study (dupilumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Chandra 1989 Intervention used in study (various foods) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Chervinsky 2003 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Clavel 1998 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Corren 2003 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Corren 2010 Intervention used in study (il‐4ralpha antagonist) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Cullell‐Young 2002 Not a RCT
Dasgupta 2016 Participants did not have a diagnosis of asthma (COPD patients)
De Boever 2014 Intervention used in study (anti‐IL‐13 mab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Djukanovic 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Ebner 1989 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Eckman 2010 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
El‐Nawawy 2000 Not a RCT
EUCTR2012‐004385‐17‐BE The study participants did not have asthma
EUCTR2014‐002666‐76‐GB Treatment period < 16 weeks
EUCTR2014‐003162‐25‐DE The study participants did not have asthma
EUCTR2015‐001152‐29‐BE Not an RCT and endpoints are not applicable as this is a long‐term access programme
EUCTR2015‐003697‐32‐NL Not placebo‐controlled. Single treatment arm only
EUCTR2016‐001831‐10‐NL No placebo arm/single treatment arm and treatment duration < 16 weeks
EUCTR2016‐002405‐19‐DE Participants do not have a diagnosis of asthma, no placebo arm, treatment duration < 16 weeks
Fahy 1997 Intervention used in study (anti‐IgE) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Fahy 1999 Intervention used in study (anti‐IgE) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Ferrguson 2016 Treatment duration < 16 weeks in length
Finn 2003 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Flood‐Page 2003 Treatment < 16 weeks
Flood‐Page 2007 Treatment < 16 weeks
Frew 1998 Intervention used in study (anti‐IgE) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Garcia 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gauvreau 2011 Intervention used in study ( anti‐IL‐13) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gauvreau 2014a Intervention used in study ( anti‐tslp) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gauvreau 2014b Intervention used in study (ox40l antagonism) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gauvreau 2014c Intervention used in study (quilizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gauvreau 2015a Intervention used in study (ligelizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gauvreau 2015b Intervention used in study (ligelizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gevaert 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Gordon 1972 Intervention used in study is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Greenberg 1991 Participants do not have a diagnosis of asthma
Gunsoy 2016 Not a randomised, placebo‐controlled trial
Han 2009 Intervention used in study ( jade screen powder) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hanania 2011 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hanania 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hanania 2014 Intervention used in study (lebrikizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hanania 2015 Intervention used in study (lebrikizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Harris 2016 Intervention used in study (quilizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hendeles 2015 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hill 1982 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hodsman 2013 Intervention used in study ( anti‐IL‐13) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Holgate 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Hoshino 2012 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Humbert 2005 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Humbert 2008 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Humbert 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Jacquemin 1995 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Jutel 2005 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Kang 1988 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Kips 2003 Treatment < 16 weeks
Kon 2001 Intervention used in study (anti‐cd4) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Kopp 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Kopp 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Kulus 2010 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Lanier 2003 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Lanier 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Laviolette 2013 Treatment < 16 weeks
Leckie 2000 Treatment < 16 weeks
Leynadier 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Li 2016 Review article, not a RCT
Lizaso 2008 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Lugogo 2016 Not a randomised, placebo‐controlled trial
Maspero 2016 Combined secondary analysis of two trials: NCT01287039 and NCT01285323
Massanari 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Massanari 2010 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Metzger 1998 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Milgrom 1999 Intervention used in study (anti‐IgE) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Milgrom 2001 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Modlin 1977 Participants do not have diagnosis of asthma
Moss 1987 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Nair 2009 Focus of trial is on steroid reduction and therefore does not meet our predefined inclusion criteria
Nair 2016 All participants do not have a diagnosis of asthma
NCT00783289 2008 Treatment duration < 16 weeks
NCT00802438 Non randomised study
NCT01290887 2011 Study does not include a placebo arm
NCT01366521 Phase 2 study comparing three doses of mepolizumab. This trial does not have a placebo arm
NCT01471327 Focus of study was on tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single dose SB‐240563 administered intravenously to Japanese healthy male participants. People with asthma were not included in the study.
NCT01691859 This study does not include a placebo group. Multi‐centre, open‐label, long‐term safety study with total sample receiving 100 mg mepolizumab administered subcutaneously (no control group)
NCT01842607 This study does not include a placebo group. Multi‐centre, open‐label, long‐term safety study with total sample receiving 100 mg mepolizumab administered subcutaneously (no control group)
NCT02075255 2014 Focus of trial is on oral steroid reduction
NCT02135692 This study does not include a placebo group. Multi‐center, open‐label, long‐term study of subcutaneously (SC) administered mepolizumab 100 mg in addition to standard of care (SOC), in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma
NCT02258542 2014 Not a RCT (an extension study with no placebo arm)
NCT02293265 Aim of study is to provide a 'reliable description of the severe asthma patient landscape with respect to the potential eligibility for treatment with mepolizumab, omalizumab, and reslizumab'. No pharmaceutical intervention in study
NCT02417961 2015 Not a RCT
NCT02501629 2015 Focus of trial is on oral steroid reduction
NCT02559791 Not placebo‐controlled ‐ single treatment arm only
NCT02808819 2016 Not a RCT
NCT02814643 2016 Treatment duration < 16 weeks
NCT02869438 Treatment duration < 16 weeks
NCT02937168 Treatment duration < 16 weeks
NCT02968914 Not a placebo‐controlled trial
NCT03014674 Not a placebo‐controlled trial and treatment duration < 16 weeks
NCT03021304 No placebo arm/single treatment arm, treatment duration < 16 weeks
Newbold 2016 Not a RCT
Niven 2008 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Noga 2003 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Noga 2008 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Noonan 2013 Intervention used in study (lebrikizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Nowak 2015 Treatment < 16 weeks
Oba 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Oh 2013 Intervention used in study (anti‐IL‐9) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Ohashi 1997 Participants do not have a diagnosis of asthma
Ohman 1984 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Ohta 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Ong 2005 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Park 1998 Not a RCT
Parker 2010 Intervention used in study (anti‐IL‐9) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Pauli 1984 Intervention used in study (immunotherapy) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Pavord 2012b Posthoc analysis of Pavord 2012a and Ortega 2014 stratified by prior use of anti‐IgE therapy
Pelaia 2016 Study is not a RCT
Pham 2016 An analysis of sera collected from asthma patients enrolled in two clinical studies: NCT00659659 and NCT00783289
Piper 2012 Intervention used in study (tralokinumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Piper 2013 Intervention used in study (tralokinumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Pouliquen 2015 Study has no placebo arm or clinical endpoints
Pouliquen 2016 Aggregation of two clinical trials
Prazma 2016 Study is not a randomised, placebo controlled trial
Prieto 2006 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Pui 2010 Intervention used in study (air/diesel exhaust +/‐ antioxidant) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Ranade 2015 Intervention used in study (tralokinumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Rose 2009 Intervention used in study (pneumococcal vaccine) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Sakamoto 1984 Not a RCT
Scheerens 2011 Intervention used in study (lebrikizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Scheerens 2012 Intervention used in study (lebrikizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Scheerens 2014 Intervention used in study (lebrikizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Siergiejko 2011 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Silk 1998 Intervention used in study (pneumococcal vaccine) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Silkoff 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Simoes 2007 Intervention used in study (pavilizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Singh 2010 Intervention used in study (anti‐IL‐13) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Slavin 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Soler 2001 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Sorkness 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Sthoeger 2007 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Sugaya 1994 Intervention used in study (influenza vaccine) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Swanson 2014 Intervention used in study (dupilumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Szymaniak 1998 Not a RCT
Tanaka 1993 Intervention used in study (influenza vaccine) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Terr 1969 Study predates monoclonal treatments
Van Rensen 2009 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Vignola 2004 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Virchow 2016 Aggregation of two clinical trials
Wang 2015 Pharmacometrics assessment of phase IIb data to characterize the exposure‐response relationship with Benralizumab in adults with asthma.
Wark 2003 Intervention used in study (itraconazole) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Weinstein 2016 Combined secondary analysis of two trials: NCT01287039 and NCT01285323
Wenzel 2009 Intervention used in study (golimumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Wenzel 2013a Intervention used in study (dupilumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Wenzel 2013b Interventionused in study (dupilumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Wenzel 2014 Intervention used in study (dupilumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Yan 2015 Participants do not have a diagnosis of asthma
Zetterstrom 1972 Participants do not all have diagnosis of asthma
Zhu 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy
Zielen 2013 Intervention used in study (omalizumab) is not anti‐IL‐5 therapy

RCT: randomised controlled trial