Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 12;2014(2):CD003249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003249.pub3

Comparison 6. Lower uterine segment compression versus conventional treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Maternal mortality 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Serious maternal morbidity 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Hysterectomy 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Blood loss 500 mL or more after enrolment 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.13 [0.02, 0.94]
5 Blood loss 1000 mL or more after enrolment 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.2 [0.01, 4.01]
6 Average blood loss after enrolment 1 64 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐103.00 [‐260.00, 52.00]
7 Blood transfusion 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.33 [0.66, 8.23]
8 Other surgical interventions to control bleeding (other than hysterectomy) 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Unsatisfactory response after enrolment 1 64 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.15, 6.67]