Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;2015(12):CD007394. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007394.pub2

Maertens 2002.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Prospective; consecutive series of patients
Patient characteristics and setting 100 participants
 Age ranged from 17 to 58 years
 67% males
Belgium
Adults with haematological disorders who underwent myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT)
Exclusion of autologous transplants and patients undergoing non‐myeloablative conditioning
Index tests Platelia
Serum samples were collected twice weekly, and more often if patients were proven or probable
2 consecutives was positive. Results were reported back to clinicians once a week
Cut‐off value 1.0 ODI
Target condition and reference standard(s) Invasive aspergillosis, as defined by EORTC criteria (Ascioglu 2002)
Galactomannan ELISA was not mentioned as part of the reference criteria
Flow and timing All patients were classified according to the same reference criteria
Withdrawals explained? Yes
 Uninterpretable results reported? No
Comparative  
No patients per category 5 proven, 8 probable, 34 possible, 53 no IA
Notes Also postmortem details given
Nothing reported about financial support
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Yes    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Yes    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Unclear    
    Unclear