Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;2015(12):CD007394. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007394.pub2

Xie_L 2006.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Prospective; consecutive series of patients
Patient characteristics and setting 81 participants
 Both children and adults
 Inpatients
 China
Haematology department; included when fever (T > 38.5 ℃); ineffective after 4 days therapy of broad spectrum antibiotic; neutrophile granulocyte < 1.0 × 109/L
Representative spectrum? Yes: all patients in the haematology department who fulfilled the inclusion criteria
Index tests Platelia Aspergillus; index test was done every 3 to 4 days; cut‐off was 1.5 ODI and 2 subsequent positive samples were needed for a positive result
Target condition and reference standard(s) Invasive aspergillosis, as defined by the Editorial Board of the Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
Incorporation avoided? Unclear: this was not clearly reported
 Acceptable reference standard? Unclear: we are not sure that the Chinese criteria are exactly the same as the 'Western' criteria
Flow and timing Not reported
Partial verification avoided? Yes: all patients were classified according to the reference criteria
 Withdrawals explained? Unclear: not reported
 Uninterpretable results reported? Unclear: not reported
Comparative  
No patients per category 11 proven, 23 probable, 33 possible and 14 no IA
Notes Sponsoring precluded? No financial support reported
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Yes    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Yes    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    Low Unclear
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Yes    
    Low Low
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
    Low Unclear
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
    Low