Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;2015(12):CD007394. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007394.pub2

Xu_M 2009.

Study characteristics
Patient sampling Enrolment not reported
Patient characteristics and setting 172 inpatients; China
Haematology department; non‐responsive fever
Representative spectrum? Unclear: haematology department; non‐responsive fever. No information about enrollment and whether the study was prospective
Index tests Platelia test; cut‐off single sample 0.7; or twice 0.5
Target condition and reference standard(s) Criteria of the Editorial Board of the Chinese Journal of Medicine
Incorporation avoided? Yes: Platelia explicitly excluded from criteria
 Acceptable reference standard? Unclear: Chinese criteria. The patients were divided into 3 groups: proven/probable; possible; no IA
Flow and timing Timing not reported
Partial verification avoided? Yes
 Withdrawals explained? No: not reported
 Uninterpretable results reported? No: not reported
Comparative  
No patients per category 2 proven; 37 probable; 58 possible; 76 no IA
Notes Not supported by Platelia
Chinese language
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? Unclear    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
    Unclear Unclear
DOMAIN 2: Index Test All tests
Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? Unclear    
If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? Unclear    
    Unclear Unclear
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Unclear    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Unclear    
    Unclear Unclear
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? Yes    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Unclear    
    Unclear