Skip to main content
. 1998 Oct 26;1998(4):CD000935. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000935

Comparison 1. Labour diagnosis education versus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Visits to labour suite before active labour 1 208 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.29 [‐0.47, ‐0.11]
2 Out‐of‐hospital emergencies 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Artificial rupture of membranes 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Intrapartum analgesia 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Intrapartum oxytocics 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
6 Forceps/vacuum extraction 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Caesarean section rates (overall) 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8 Caesarean section rates for labour dystocia 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Satisfaction with care 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
10 Admission to neonatal intensive care 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
11 Admission to labour ward on first visit 0 0 Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
12 Empowerment 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]