Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;161(5):875–884. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03878-5

Table 1.

Patient cohort information

Number of patients 108
Age (years) 65 ± 17.3
Male 57 (52.8)
Trauma mechanism
  Fall 58 (53.7)
  Assault 5 (4.6)
  Motor vehicle accident 12 (11.1)
  Fall from bike 12 (11.1)
  Other 21 (19.4)
TBI severity
  Very severe (GCS3–5) 22 (20.4)
  Severe (GCS3–8) 49 (45.4)
  Moderate (GCS9–12) 19 (17.6)
  Mild (GCS13–15) 40 (37.0)
Clinical parameters
  GCS score 9.63 ± 4.3
  Pupil abnormality* 27 (26.7)
  Focal neurologic symptoms 42 (38.9)
  Major extracranial injury 12 (11.1)
CT parameters
  Thickness (mm) 13.6 ± 6.1
  Midline shift (mm) 11.4 ± 6.6
  Concomitant lesion 48 (44.4)
  Basal cisterns compressed 39 (36.1)
Treatment
  Conservative 18 (16.7)
  Emergent surgical intervention: 90 (83.3)
  Craniotomy − 60 (55.6)
  Decompressive craniectomy (DC) − 29 (26.9)
  ICP monitoring − 40 (37.0)
In-hospital mortality 41 (37.9)
Functional outcome
  GOS1–3 (unfavorable) 56 (51.9)
  GOS4–5 (favorable) 50 (46.3)
  Missing GOS 2 (1.9)
QOLIBRI response
  FU time, months 46 ± 16
  Yes 25 (23.1)
  No (died; too disabled) 53 (48; 5)
  No, other 30 (27.8)

Table 1 provides general information about the patient cohort. Legend: N (%) or mean ± SD, unless stated otherwise

SD, standard deviation; GCS, Glasgow Coma Score; CT, computed tomography; DC, decompressive craniectomy; ICP, intracranial pressure; GOS, Glasgow Outcome Score; QOLIBRI, quality of life after brain injury; FU, follow-up

*At least one pupil unresponsive to light upon arrival in the emergency room (missing for seven patients)