Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;45(5):627–636. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05552-x

Table 1.

Summary of recruitment demographics, family structure, and types of mutation reported including mode of inheritance

Number of probands sequenced 195
Family structure Singleton: 3 (1%), Parent + child: 18 (9%), Trio: 169 (87%), Othera: 5 (3%)
Gender Male: 99 (51%), Female: 96 (49%)
Recruitment ward NICUb: 106 (54%), PICU: 61 (31%),
Paediatric Neurology: 23 (12%), Clinical Genetics: 5 (3%)
Age at recruitment NICU: 1 day–6 months (median 12 days)
Other: 8 days–16.8 yearsc (median 24 months)
Genetic diagnosis via WGS 40 (21%)
ACMG classification Pathogenic: 21, Likely pathogenic: 17, VUSd: 2
Contribution to phenotype Fully explained: 38, Partially explained: 2
Inheritance pattern De novo: 27 (autosomal dominant: 24, X-linked dominant: 2, X-linked recessive: 1)
Inherited: 13 (homozygous: 4, compound heterozygous: 6, X-linked recessive: 2, X-linked dominant: 1)
Variant type Loss of function: 18 (frameshift: 8, stop gain: 3, splicing: 4, structural variant: 3), missense: 21, in-frame deletion: 1

aIncludes trio + sibling (4) and trio + grandparents (1)

bIncludes two cases from other postnatal wards

cIn addition there is one 23-year-old

dOne case (44) was a duo and likely pathogenic pending confirmation of de novo; one case (138) was a missense VUS in trans with a pathogenic loss of function variant