Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 14;9(2):184–193. doi: 10.1089/brain.2018.0601

Table 1.

Summary of Machine Learning Results

    SVM LDA NB
Measure Frequency band Accuracy AUC Features Accuracy AUC Features Accuracy AUC Features
RSFC Slow-2 57.14 0.52 57 63.87 0.62 3 61.34 0.60 3
Slow-3 65.55 0.67 14 63.03 0.62 12 63.03 0.61 21
Slow-4 52.10 0.44 3 53.78 0.43 3 52.94 0.42 3
Slow-5 75.63 0.80 10 75.63 0.80 8 76.47 0.79 11
Slow-4 + 5 84.87 0.86 31 81.51 0.86 36 83.19 0.88 29
LFO 72.27 0.72 5 69.75 0.71 5 73.95 0.79 60
All 72.27 0.72 37 69.75 0.73 27 68.07 0.69 26
ALFFs Slow-2 52.94 0.43 25 53.78 0.49 34 57.98 0.56 33
Slow-3 63.03 0.59 4 67.23 0.69 1 66.39 0.67 1
Slow-4 69.75 0.71 17 68.91 0.72 17 69.75 0.73 17
Slow-5 78.99 0.81 11 77.31 0.81 13 73.11 0.76 12
Slow-4 + 5 64.71 0.65 3 67.23 0.68 3 64.71 0.67 3
LFO 73.95 0.72 14 78.15 0.81 14 69.75 0.72 15
All 62.18 0.56 6 61.34 0.61 8 63.87 0.64 10
fALFFs Slow-2 53.78 0.46 22 59.66 0.58 2 60.50 0.57 2
Slow-3 54.62 0.42 12 73.11 0.78 6 72.27 0.75 6
Slow-4 64.71 0.55 2 63.87 0.64 2 65.55 0.65 2
Slow-5 70.59 0.70 6 68.07 0.70 6 64.71 0.69 2
Slow-4 + 5 56.30 0.46 6 55.46 0.53 25 56.30 0.53 24
LFO 58.82 0.50 16 55.46 0.54 3 63.03 0.57 20

Bold values represent the best results per category.

The three resting-state measures and seven frequency bands tested are organized in the leftmost columns. The three traditional machine learning models trained are organized in the top row. The accuracies are the LOOCV accuracies. “Features” column indicates the number of features selected from the RFE feature selection. Best LOOCV accuracies were achieved with Slow-4 + 5 RSFC features.

ALFFs, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; AUC, area-under-the-curve; fALFFs, fractional ALFFs; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; LFO, low-frequency oscillation; LOOCV, leave-one-out cross-validation; NB, naive Bayes; RFE, recursive feature elimination; RSFC, resting-state functional connectivity; SVM, support vector machine.