Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;2017(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3
Methods Randomised trial
Participants 1632 participants (858 intervention, 774 control)
Mean age: 81 years
Male:female proportion: 33.3% male
Inclusion criteria: patients ≥ 70 years of age admitted to general medical service
Exclusion criteria: admitted to intensive care units/other speciality units, electively; length of stay < 2 days
Interventions Intervention team members: attending geriatrician, trained nursing, social workers, physiotherapists
Intervention team organisation: comprehensive assessment, at least weekly MDT meetings, assessment tools, protocols, ward environment, outpatient follow‐up
Control: general inpatient unit, where younger and older patients resided together
Outcomes Alive and in own home
Death
Re‐admission
Activities of daily living
Length of stay
Resource use
Trial conclusions: resulted in reduced length of stay and in cost savings
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated random numbers
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) High risk Blinding of participants not possible, blinding of services not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) for objective outcome measures Low risk Objective outcome measures (e.g. living at home) unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) for subjective outcome measures Unclear risk No details of outcome assessors given
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk No missing data reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol available
Other bias Low risk Little evidence of contamination of control group