Methods | Year: 1989 Location: Durham, North Caroina, USA (VA Centre) Team/ward?: team Timing: acute (within 48 hours) Trial method: randomised trial | |
Participants | Number (total): 178 Mean age: 81 years Male:female proportion: 96% male Inclusion criteria: patients ≥ 75 years of age Exclusion criteria: admitted to ICU; had previously received geriatric care; expected length of stay < 48 hours | |
Interventions |
Team members: senior geriatrician, trainee geriatrician, specialist
nurse, social worker Team organisation: comprehensive assessment and recommendations made,
at least weekly multi‐disciplinary meetings, standardised assessment
tools Control: usual care. |
|
Outcomes | Activities of daily living/dependence Institutionalisation Death Trial conclusions: no significant effect on functional decline |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computerised randomisation scheme |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation concealment not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) | High risk | Blinding of participants and personnel not possible |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) for objective outcome measures | Low risk | Objective measures (e.g. living at home) unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) for subjective outcome measures | Low risk | Outcome assessors blinded to the allocation. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient reporting of attritions/exclusions |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No a priori documentation found to judge this item |
Other bias | Low risk | No clear evidence of contamination of control group |