Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;2017(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3
Methods Year: 1989 Location: Durham, North Caroina, USA (VA Centre) Team/ward?: team Timing: acute (within 48 hours) Trial method: randomised trial
Participants Number (total): 178 Mean age: 81 years Male:female proportion: 96% male Inclusion criteria: patients ≥ 75 years of age Exclusion criteria: admitted to ICU; had previously received geriatric care; expected length of stay < 48 hours
Interventions Team members: senior geriatrician, trainee geriatrician, specialist nurse, social worker Team organisation: comprehensive assessment and recommendations made, at least weekly multi‐disciplinary meetings, standardised assessment tools
Control: usual care.
Outcomes Activities of daily living/dependence
Institutionalisation
Death Trial conclusions: no significant effect on functional decline
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computerised randomisation scheme
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) High risk Blinding of participants and personnel not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) for objective outcome measures Low risk Objective measures (e.g. living at home) unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) for subjective outcome measures Low risk Outcome assessors blinded to the allocation.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient reporting of attritions/exclusions
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No a priori documentation found to judge this item
Other bias Low risk No clear evidence of contamination of control group