Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;2019(4):CD004055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004055.pub2

4. Overview of studies on irradiation with UV light: investigator‐rated good/excellent control.

Study Comparison Investigator‐rated good/excellent control in RR (95% CI) Comment
Bayerl 1999 UVB versus no UVB No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Sjövall 1987 Local UVB versus placebo RR 2.0 (95% CI 0.26 to 15.6)
Sjövall 1987 Local UVB hand versus whole body + hand UVB RR 2.2 (95% CI 0.83 to 5.8)
Sjövall 1987 Local UVB hand versus whole body versus placebo RR 3.67 (95% CI 0.90 to 14.97)
van Coevorden 2004a Oral PUVA versus topical bath PUVA No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Grattan 1991 Topical PUVA versus UVA No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control Within‐patient study
Polderman 2003 UVA‐1 versus placebo No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Brass 2015 Local NB‐UVB versus topical PUVA RR 0.50 (95% CI 0.22 to 1.16)
Sezer 2007 Local NB‐UVB versus topical PUVA NB‐UVB was effective in 2/12 hands and topical PUVA was effective in 1/12 hands Within‐patient study
Tzaneva 2009 Oral PUVA versus bath PUVA No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Adams 2007 UVA‐1 versus topical cream PUVA No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control Within‐patient study
Said 2010 Local UVA‐1 versus topical betamethasone‐valerate cream No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control

CI: confidence interval.

RR: risk ratio.

NB‐UVB: narrow‐band ultraviolet B.

PUVA: psoralen + ultraviolet A.

UVB: ultraviolet B.

UVA‐1: a subtype of ultraviolet A.