6. Overview of studies on topical calcineurin inhibitors: investigator‐rated good/excellent control.
Study | Comparison | Investigator‐rated good/excellent control in RR (95% CI) | Comments |
Schnopp 2002 | Tacrolimus ointment versus mometasone furoate | No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control | Within‐patient study |
Katsarou 2012 | Tacrolimus ointment versus mometasone furoate | No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control | Improvement was reported separately for subcategories of clinical signs |
Krejci‐Manwaring 2008 | Tacrolimus ointment versus vehicle | No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control | ‐ |
Pacor 2006 | Tacrolimus ointment versus vehicle | RR 29.0 (95% CI 1.9 to 443.25) | ‐ |
Belsito 2004 | Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle | RR 1.53 (95% CI 0.99 to 2.36) | ‐ |
Hordinsky 2010 | Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle | RR 1.28 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.66) | ‐ |
Bauer 2012 | Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle | No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control | ‐ |
Baskan 2005 | Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle | No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control | ‐ |
Cherill 2000 | Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle | No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control | ‐ |
CI: confidence interval.
RR: risk ratio.