Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;2019(4):CD004055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004055.pub2

6. Overview of studies on topical calcineurin inhibitors: investigator‐rated good/excellent control.

Study Comparison Investigator‐rated good/excellent control in RR (95% CI) Comments
Schnopp 2002 Tacrolimus ointment versus mometasone furoate No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control Within‐patient study
Katsarou 2012 Tacrolimus ointment versus mometasone furoate No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control Improvement was reported separately for subcategories of clinical signs
Krejci‐Manwaring 2008 Tacrolimus ointment versus vehicle No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Pacor 2006 Tacrolimus ointment versus vehicle RR 29.0 (95% CI 1.9 to 443.25)
Belsito 2004 Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle RR 1.53 (95% CI 0.99 to 2.36)
Hordinsky 2010 Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle RR 1.28 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.66)
Bauer 2012 Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Baskan 2005 Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control
Cherill 2000 Pimecrolimus cream versus vehicle No data regarding the primary outcome investigator‐rated good/excellent control

CI: confidence interval.

RR: risk ratio.