Lauriola 2011.
Methods | Parallel‐group, randomised controlled trial This study was carried out in a secondary care setting at a single centre in Italy |
|
Participants | 40 participants with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis of hands No dropouts Inclusion criteria of the trial
Exclusion criteria of the trial
Study population
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention • Furpalmate‐containing creams (0.3%) twice a day for 14 days in 20 participants • Corticosteroid (hydrocortisone acetate 0.5%) twice a day for 14 days in 20 participants Duration 2 weeks |
|
Outcomes |
Primary outcomes of the trial Not defined Other outcomes
|
|
Notes | Conference abstract, from which only limited information can be extracted The secondary outcomes ‐ reduction in severity, participant‐ and investigator‐rated ‐ were included but did not provide reproducible data Study authors were contacted on 28 February 2014 but were not responsive Declarations of interest: not stated Funding: not stated Sample size rationale: not stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "a single‐center, randomized, prospective, investigator blinded, controlled trial..." Quote: "...patients were randomly allocated..." Comment: study authors stated randomised but gave no clear description of how this was attained |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details of how allocation was concealed from participants and investigators |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "a single‐center, randomized, perspective, investigator blinded, controlled trial..." Comment: study authors stated investigator‐blinded; participants were not blinded (open‐label?), although this is not clear |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Quote: "a single‐center, randomized, prospective, investigator blinded, controlled trial..." Comment: the article states only that the study was done in an investigator‐blinded way. We considered this as insufficient information to judge this risk of bias |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "all patients completed the study period" Comment: all participants completed the study |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No trial registration found. The abstract is very concise, and not all outcomes listed in the Methods section are described in the Results section, for example, cosmetic aspects or adverse events |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Baseline comparisons: no baseline comparisons regarding group differences (randomisation check) Diagnostic certainty: yes The study was completed |