Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;2017(6):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2
Methods For characteristics see Izumi 2014a1
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central randomisation centre
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Unblinded after week 24
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes High risk Unblinded after week 24
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Only 1 person dropped out
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk The trial changed the primary outcomes
Vested‐interest bias High risk The trial was funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias