Methods |
For characteristics see OPERA 2011a1
|
Participants |
|
Interventions |
|
Outcomes |
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Randomisation was achieved using the central interactive web response system, managed by ClinPhone Group Ltd |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes |
Low risk |
Described as double‐blinded and placebo described as identical |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk |
Not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Low risk |
Only 5 participants were not included in the intention‐to‐treat analysis resulting in under 5% with missing data. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Low risk |
All outcomes in the protocol were reported on |
Vested‐interest bias |
High risk |
This study was sponsored by Tibotec Pharmaceuticals |
Other bias |
Low risk |
The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias |