Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;2017(6):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2
Methods For characteristics see OPERA 2011a1
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation was achieved using the central interactive web response system, managed by ClinPhone Group Ltd
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk Described as double‐blinded and placebo described as identical
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk Only 5 participants were not included in the intention‐to‐treat analysis resulting in under 5% with missing data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes in the protocol were reported on
Vested‐interest bias High risk This study was sponsored by Tibotec Pharmaceuticals
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias