Methods | Randomised phase II clinical trial | |
Participants | 225 participants Inclusion criteria: HCV treatment‐naïve adults aged 18 years or older with serologic evidence of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, a serum HCV RNA level 50,000 IU/mL, and an absence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (METAVIR score of F3‐4). Exclusion criteria: participants infected with HCV non‐1 genotypes or co‐infected with HBV or with HIV were excluded, as were participants with liver disease attributable to a cause other than HCV infection, cardiac or renal disease, severe psychiatric disease, uncontrolled seizures, severe retinopathy, immunologically‐mediated disease, poorly controlled diabetes, or who were pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were also excluded if they had a haemoglobin concentration < 11 g/dL (women), or < 12 g/dL (men); neutrophil count < 1.5 x 109 cells/L; platelet count < 90 x 109 cells/L; serum creatinine concentration > 1.5 times the ULN); or BMI (calculated as kg/m2) < 18 or > 36. The use of agents that could interfere with the metabolism of danoprevir was prohibited. |
|
Interventions |
Experimental group:
Control group: placebo with peg‐IFN–RBV for 24 or 48 weeks Co‐intervention: peg‐IFN (subcutaneously at 180 µg/week) and RBV orally twice daily dosed according to body weight |
|
Outcomes | HCV RNA (SVR), safety assessment | |
Notes | we emailed Marcellin and colleagues on 27 April 2016 for additional information but reply not received yet. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The trial used a computer‐generated randomisation code |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Interactive voice/web response system |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | The trial was described as "partial‐blind labeling" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | The trial was described as being double‐blinded but it was unclear how the blinding was performed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | More than 5% dropped out |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes stated in the protocol were assessed (NCT00963885) |
Vested‐interest bias | High risk | The trial was funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb |
Other bias | Low risk | The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias |