Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;2017(6):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2
Methods For characteristics see COMMAND‐1 2015a1
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk The trial used interactive voice‐response system
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk The participants were only blinded until week 24
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes High risk The sponsors, who performed the analyses, were only blinded until week 12
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk More than 5% dropped out
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes stated in the protocol were assessed
Vested‐interest bias High risk The trial was funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb.
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias