Methods | Randomised phase III clinical trial | |
Participants | 188 participants Inclusion criteria: HCV genotype 1 infection, treatment‐naive male and female participants aged 20–70 years with documented chronic genotype 1 HCV infection and plasma HCV RNA P5.0 log10 IU/mL at screening. Exclusion criteria: liver cirrhosis, hepatic failure, any other liver disease of non‐HCV etiology and co‐infection with HIV‐1, HIV‐2, hepatitis B, or non‐genotype 1 HCV. |
|
Interventions |
Experimental group: simeprevir 100 mg once a day plus peg‐IFNa‐2a/RBV for 12 weeks followed by response‐guided therapy with peg‐IFNa‐2a/RBV alone for 12 or 36 weeks. Control group: placebo with peg‐IFNa‐2a/RBV for 12 weeks followed by peg‐IFNa‐2a/RBV for 36 weeks. Peg‐IFNα‐2a (Pegasys®, Chugai, Japan) was administered as a subcutaneous injection (180 μg once weekly) and RBV (Copegus®, Chugai) as oral tablets (600‐1000 mg total daily dose, depending on body weight). Co‐intervention: peg‐IFN (subcutaneously at 180 µg/week) and RBV orally twice daily dosed according to body weight. |
|
Outcomes | HCV RNA, safety assessment, ALT/AST elevations. | |
Notes | We emailedWe emailed Hayashi and colleagues on 21 April 2016 for additional information but reply not received yet. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | The trial was described as double‐blinded but it was unclear how the blinding was performed |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | The trial was described as double‐blinded but it was unclear how the blinding was performed |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | More than 5% dropped out |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes stated in the protocol were assessed (NCT01292239) |
Vested‐interest bias | High risk | The trial was funded by Bristol‐Myers Squibb |
Other bias | Low risk | The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias |