Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;2017(6):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2
Methods Multicenter randomised clinical trial
Participants 52 participants
Sex: 35 men, 17 women
Mean age: 44 years
Countries: France, UK, Italy, and Sweden
Inclusion criteria: 18–65 years; chronic infection with either genotype 2 or genotype 3 HCV (serum HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/mL); absolute neutrophil count > 1500 mm3 and platelet count > 100,000 mm3; no prior treatment for HCV
Exclusion criteria: relevant concomitant medical condition; decompensated liver disease or cirrhosis, or other significant liver disease; HIV or HBV co‐infection; peg‐IFN or RBV contraindication; a history of alcohol or illicit drug use; pregnancy/breast feeding
Interventions The participants were randomised according to genotype 2 and 3
Experimental group 1: oral 750 mg telaprevir every 8th hour for 2 weeks
Experimental group 2: oral 750 mg telaprevir every 8th hour + peg‐IFN‐α‐2a 180 µg once weekly plus RBV 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks
Control group: telaprevir placebo (every 8 h) plus peg‐IFN‐α‐2a 180 µg once weekly plus RBV 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks
Co‐intervention: The peg‐IFN‐α‐2a and RBV were a co‐intervention between control group and experimental group 2 during treatment period, and all participants received peg‐IFN‐α‐2a 180 g once weekly plus RBV 400 mg twice daily for 24 weeks after treatment.
Outcomes Viral kinetics, efficacy and safety assessment
Notes We emailed Foster and colleagues on 21 April 2016 for additional information (randomisation, blinding, death, missing data) but reply not received yet.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described (central randomisation system)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk The monotherapy group was not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk More than 5% percent dropped out (7 participants)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes stated in the protocol were assessed
Vested‐interest bias Unclear risk The trial was funded by Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Vertex Pharmaceuticals)
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias