Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 6;2017(6):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2
Methods For characteristics see Fundamental 2014a1
Participants
Interventions
Outcomes
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk There was only missing data for 2 participants
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk The secondary outcomes were changed from the original secondary outcomes
Vested‐interest bias High risk The study was funded by Novartis
Other bias Low risk The trial appeared to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias