Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 8;2(2):e188006. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8006

Table 2. Patient and Treatment Characteristics.

Characteristic Value (N = 2142)
Age
Mean (SD), y 67.9 (9.5)
Median (range), y 68 (41-92)
Risk grouping, No. (%)
Low risk 1185 (55.3)
Favorable intermediate risk 692 (32.3)
Unfavorable intermediate riska 265 (12.4)
Gleason grade, No. (%)
I 1355 (63.3)
II 614 (28.7)
III 173 (8.1)
Clinical T stage, No. (%)
T1c 1595 (74.5)
T2a 430 (20.1)
T2b 104 (4.9)
T2c 13 (0.6)
Initial prostate-specific antigen level
Mean (SD), ng/mL 6.4 (3.1)
Median (range), ng/mL 5.7 (0.09-19.9)
Equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions, No. (%)
≥91 Gy 797 (37.2)
<91 Gy 1346 (62.8)
Treatment platform, No. (%)
Robotic arm–mounted linear acceleratorb 1479 (69.0)
Gantry-mounted linear accelerator 664 (31.0)
Fractionation, No. (%)
Daily 1013 (47.3)
Every other day 1015 (47.4)
Weekly 114 (5.3)
Androgen deprivation therapy use, No./total No. (%)
Total 115/2142 (5.4)
Low 43/1185 (3.6)
Favorable 47/692 (6.8)
Unfavorable 25/265 (9.4)
Duration of androgen deprivation therapy, mean (SD), mo 3.6 (4.2)
a

Percentage of positive cores was not available for 248 of 957 intermediate-risk patients (25.9%) who did not have other factors that could classify them as having unfavorable intermediate-risk disease; in instances of ambiguity, patients were classified conservatively as having favorable intermediate-risk disease.

b

CyberKnife (Accuray Inc).